from ancient time to the present, many great men have been commented on endlessly. take the cases of confucius, emperor qinshihuang, empress wu zetian, gengis khan, dr. sun yet-sun, chairman mao, deng xiaoping, etc.. both positive and negative criticism have been made about them. they not only enjoyed compliments but also suffered slanders from all over the world.
when commenting on what's right and what's wrong, the commenting ones themselves don't really know what is wrong and what is right. they are simply demanding perfection. when criticizing the others' inability, they themselves are actually unable to do anything, but simply pretending that they know better. this can well be compared with the actors and spectators. a new program is always followed by large amounts of criticism from the spectators. but if a spectator is given a chance to perform, a disaster will surely happen. diners are always commenting on the skills of the chefs while readers are always criticizing the writers. another case in point is the forty-chapter sequel of a dream of the red mansions , which were written by gao e who did a nearly perfect job. nevertheless there are always such people who claim to be the experts on the novel, criticizing the latter forty chapters as a wretched sequel to a fine work. what if we ask them to write the sequel? i'm afraid they can only make it worse. it's easier said than done.
capable and wealthy people are always the focus of the society.
capable people are usually marching ahead of others and may not be properly understood, hence causing various kinds of comments, more criticism but less support;
capable people can easily succeed, thus causing both admiration and comments, more j