p>thesecourtdecisiocouldhaveanimpactonourwholenation.thedefeeofmarriageactdeclaresthatnostateisrequiredtoacceptanotherstate''sdefinitionofmarriage.ifthatactisoverturnedbyactivistcourts,thenmarriagesrecognizedinonecityorstatemighthavetoberecognizedasmarriageseverywhereelse.thatwouldmeanthateverystatewouldhavetorecognizemarriagesredefinedbyjudgesinmaachusettsorlocalofficialsinsanfrancisco,nomatterwhattheirownlawsorstatecotitutiosay.thisnationalquestionrequiresanationalsolution,andonaniueofsuchprofoundimportance,thatsolutionshouldcomefromthepeople,notthecourts.
anamendmenttothecotitutionisnecearybecauseactivistcourtshaveleftournationwithnootherchoice.thecotitutionalamendmentthatthesenatewillcoidernextweekwouldfullyprotectmarriagefrombeingredefined,whileleavingstatelegislaturesfreetomaketheirownchoicesindefininglegalarrangementsotherthanmarriage.acotitutionalamendmentisthemostdemocraticsolutiontothisiue,becauseitmustbearovedbytwo-thirdsofthehouseandsenateandthenratifiedbythree-fourthsofthe50statelegislatures.
asthisdebategoesforward,wemustrememberthateveryamericandeservestobetreatedwithtolerance,reect,anddignity.allofushaveadutytoconductthisdiscuionwithcivilityanddecencytowardoneanother,andallpeopledeservetohavetheirvoicesheard.acotitutionalamendmentwillputadecisionthatiscriticaltoamericanfamiliesandamericansocietyinthehandsoftheamericanpeople,whichisexactlywhereitbelongs.democracy,notcourtorders,shoulddecidethefutureofmarriageinamerica.
thankyouforlistening.