ingtherestofthelegislation.forty-threeofournation''s50governorshaveline-itemvetoauthority,andtheyhaveusedthatauthoritytoremoveneedleendingfromotherwisegoodbills.
tenyearsago,membersofcongrefrombothpartiesvotedtograntpresidentclintontheline-itemveto.however,thesupremecourtruledthatversionoftheline-itemvetouncotitutionalbecauseittooktoomuchendingauthorityawayfromthecongre.iproposedanewversionoftheline-itemvetothatfixestheproblemandgivesthepresidentaclearandcotitutionalwaytocutwastefulending.undermyproposal,thepresidentwouldidentifyalistofuecearyitemsthatshouldberemovedfromalargerendingbill.congrewouldthenberequiredtoholdapromptup-or-downvoteonthelist.
aline-itemvetowouldgivethepresidentawaytoiistongreaterdisciplineinthebudget.aline-itemvetowouldreducetheincentiveforcongretoendwastefullybecausewhenlawmakersknowtheirpetprojectswillbehelduptopublicscrutiny,theywillbelelikelytosuggesttheminthefirstplace.mostimportantly,aline-itemvetowouldbenefitamericantaxpayersbyeuringgreaterreectfortheirhard-earneddollars.
thispastthursday,thehouseofrepresentativespaedabillgrantingline-item-vetoauthority.thiswasavictoryforthetaxpayersandforendingrestraint.icallonthesenatetoshowabipartisancommitmenttofiscaldisciplinebypaingtheline-itemvetosowecanworktogethertocutwastefulending,reducethedeficit,andsavemoneyforamericantaxpayers.
thankyouforlistening.